On Keeping NWS stuff out of Avatars and Sigs

Dere33
Posts: 60
Joined: 26 Nov 2004 09:49

Post by Dere33 » 29 Jul 2005 00:41

I really like these forums. I like to get on them anytime there is a public termianl open.

I don't like going to forums in public places when there are half naked women and men splattered across the screen.

If you ever log onto the forums at your place of business, school, or friends house I am sure you have run into the same problem.

This poll is brought to try and make a new policy for these forums that any obscenely nws stuff be kept out of sig lines and avatars.

I have yet to really see anything that one wouldn't feel safe viewing in public but as with all forums the topic will come around and I felt now would be a decent time to bring up the question?

Whaddaya say justin(who from what I read I understand is my friend=>)?

Porn and stuff nsfw to be kept behind such tags in a title only?

Thanks for considering this.

BlackMage
Posts: 444
Joined: 09 Jul 2004 10:13
Location: Central Texas

Post by BlackMage » 29 Jul 2005 01:00

There is a way to get rid of that. View the board without images and sigs. Very simple. Its not like we post pics heavily and what not.

Smash
Posts: 547
Joined: 17 Jun 2004 15:07
Location: Warren, MI

Post by Smash » 29 Jul 2005 02:04

No. Too fucking bad. Why does YOUR restrictive behavior require the rest of the world to conform to your needs?

Nope.

AngelBaby
Posts: 556
Joined: 29 Sep 2004 11:36
Location: Cloud 9
Contact:

Post by AngelBaby » 29 Jul 2005 03:06

Smash wrote:No.  Too fucking bad.  Why does YOUR restrictive behavior require the rest of the world to conform to your needs?

Nope.

<span style='color:blue'>I concur.</span>

turtle1
Posts: 51
Joined: 29 Jul 2005 03:52

Post by turtle1 » 29 Jul 2005 05:07

AngelBaby wrote:
Smash wrote:No.  Too fucking bad.  Why does YOUR restrictive behavior require the rest of the world to conform to your needs?

Nope.

<span style='color:blue'>I concur.</span>
<span style='color:red'>i co-concur</span>

Dere33
Posts: 60
Joined: 26 Nov 2004 09:49

Post by Dere33 » 29 Jul 2005 08:04

BlackMage wrote:There is a way to get rid of that. View the board without images and sigs. Very simple. Its not like we post pics heavily and what not.

Ahh, See, I didn't realize that. Thanks.

~vjay~
Posts: 206
Joined: 29 Jul 2004 14:42
Location: Australia
Contact:

Post by ~vjay~ » 29 Jul 2005 08:24

Use firefox, adblock questionable images, that way you see all the pics without the roooooooooode ones.

ruprechtjones
Posts: 126
Joined: 23 Jul 2004 10:45
Location: Seattle
Contact:

Post by ruprechtjones » 29 Jul 2005 10:40

This isn't a site that you should visit if you are in a large corporate environment. If you insist, use the filters. And keep in mind that, despite any current laws, the I.T. department IS watching what you surf. They get bored, and you entertain them.
You want to read this site from a public termianl (sic) yet you don't want pics of half-naked women and men. My advise is to not view this site from a public terminal. That "view new posts" link can wait til you get home.
But on the other side, this new forum really doesn't have anything too offensive to it yet. Maybe I missed the gratuitous boobies thread. Is there a gratuitous boobies thread?

btw Angelbaby, my I.T. department loves your personal profile. Go Atlanta!

Skarekrow
Posts: 118
Joined: 26 Jun 2004 17:08
Location: West Texas
Contact:

Post by Skarekrow » 31 Jul 2005 06:10

turtle1 wrote:
AngelBaby wrote:
Smash wrote:No.  Too fucking bad.  Why does YOUR restrictive behavior require the rest of the world to conform to your needs?

Nope.

<span style='color:blue'>I concur.</span>
<span style='color:red'>i co-concur</span>
i concur with all of the above concurrences.

bligityblah
Posts: 185
Joined: 17 Jun 2004 09:45
Location: Dallas TX

Post by bligityblah » 31 Jul 2005 08:10

Smash wrote:No.&nbsp; Too fucking bad.&nbsp; Why does YOUR restrictive behavior require the rest of the world to conform to your needs?

Nope.
Give that gentleman a hurrumph!

BlackMage
Posts: 444
Joined: 09 Jul 2004 10:13
Location: Central Texas

Post by BlackMage » 31 Jul 2005 11:26

Hurrumph!

Dere33
Posts: 60
Joined: 26 Nov 2004 09:49

Post by Dere33 » 31 Jul 2005 12:27

christ... ok ok. the answers obvious.... sorry for even bring'n it up.


=)

Smash
Posts: 547
Joined: 17 Jun 2004 15:07
Location: Warren, MI

Post by Smash » 31 Jul 2005 12:37

Dere33 wrote:christ... ok ok. the answers obvious.... sorry for even bring'n it up.


=)

Personally I find your avatar beyond annoying. You don't see me complaining about it though, do you?

Dere33
Posts: 60
Joined: 26 Nov 2004 09:49

Post by Dere33 » 31 Jul 2005 13:49

hey fucker, thats penn julliet.... he could totally whip out his 'wand' and stab you in the head. don evan beh trippen

JustSumDude
Posts: 655
Joined: 17 Jun 2004 09:52
Location: Orange County, CA
Contact:

Post by JustSumDude » 31 Jul 2005 18:37

<span style='font-family:Tahoma'><span style='color:green'>Dere33 is blatant faggotry.

I blocked about 95% of all the avatars & sigs displayed by you fagays, because I hate most of you people.

I will concur with Smash saying Dere33's avatar sucks, even though I can't see it, based purely on the fact that anyone who would start a topic this retarded must have an equally retarded image representing his retardation.

Yup.

P.S.
Dere33 wrote:don evan beh trippen
Spelling stuff wrong on purpose is fucking annoying. Go away.</span></span>

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests