Elisha Cuthbert

12 09 2005

From: Trevor316
Date: Sep 12, 2005 12:03 AM
Subject: Elisha Cuthbert See-though

This should go nicely with your see-through phase right now

Yeah, this pic has been floating around on the net for a while now. It’s also been widely speculated to be a fake, but i haven’t seen any conclusive evidence of it being one. And if there is, then i guess i must’ve missed it. But what the hell.

It’s kinda similar to that one Jennifer Love Hewitt pic where you can visibly see her nipples through her dress. I’ve seen two versions of it. I think it was for some magazine photoshoot. But nobody really knows which pic is real because some claim they airbrushed her nipples out of the real pic when the pic appeared in magazines and some claim that the see-thru pic is the real un-airbrushed version, which could be a fake. So who knows.


Actions

Post Info

20 responses to “Elisha Cuthbert”

    12 09 2005
  • 1.  anonymo (02:35:16) :

    looks fake

  • 12 09 2005
  • 2.  Fandango (02:42:36) :

    Look genuine. I’m requesting a link or copy of Jennifer Love Hewitt’s see thru pic so that I can make a more educated and diffinative conclusion. Thank you.

  • 12 09 2005
  • 3.  turtle (03:27:39) :
  • 12 09 2005
  • 4.  embus (04:43:31) :

    Peter Frampton.

  • 12 09 2005
  • 5.  JVC (05:03:39) :

    Knee-pulls!

  • 12 09 2005
  • 6.  Stacia (06:26:33) :

    JUSTIN. I updated but it’s a draft. It’s weird. Don’t know how to make it unweird. I EMAILED YOU BUT YOU DIDN’T ANSWER. meow.

  • 12 09 2005
  • 7.  Justin (09:35:56) :

    there are also some mandy moore puffies that got airbrushed out for print which caused a little confusion as to which set of pics where the genuine ones. needless to say, the puffy ones were the real ones. as for the JLH pic, i say it’s fake (and so does everybody else evidently). but the elisha pic? nobody knows for 100% sure.

    i’m leaning towards fake though. which is why i never posted it up before.

    #6, i emailed back!

  • 12 09 2005
  • 8.  Justin (09:40:56) :

    ps: elisha cuthbert is ugly

  • 12 09 2005
  • 9.  Wulf (09:46:02) :

    if that is real, she has huge friggin nipples.

  • 12 09 2005
  • 10.  Paperboy (10:38:13) :

    I’d love to see those Mandy shots (non-airbrushed)…

  • 12 09 2005
  • 11.  Justin (10:54:25) :

    those mandy puffies, which subsequently got airbrushed out for print

  • 12 09 2005
  • 12.  lizzy (11:02:14) :

    i say it’s a fake. the crease under her left (our right) breast goes waaaaaaaay over into the center of her chest.

    bad editing job.

    i rule.

  • 12 09 2005
  • 13.  kiko (11:36:21) :

    You can almost see the vagina.

  • 12 09 2005
  • 14.  Jacked (11:47:34) :

    #12 is right, the nipple is in a really weird place
    so:
    bad editing job*
    deformed nipples**

    *most likely
    **i really hope not

  • 12 09 2005
  • 15.  Elder Young (13:09:47) :

    Mandy’s real nipples are better than Elisha’s editor additions.

  • 12 09 2005
  • 16.  Jenesis (13:40:28) :

    I never used to like Mandy Moore. I like Mandy Moore now.

    Well, her pokies anyway.

  • 12 09 2005
  • 17.  angel (21:51:11) :

    JLH is a fake, here is the original.

    Elisha is HALF fake (someone Photoshopped the pokey darker), here is the original.

  • 12 09 2005
  • 18.  DisconcertedGeorge (22:17:23) :

    I saw The Girl Next Door over the weekend. Elish Cuthbert was surprisingly not annoying and pretty hot.

    The film was the most boring pile of shit I have ever seen. Way to take a comedy concept and make it into a regular romance movie Mr Fucking Director.

    If you’ve seen the trailer you have seen ALL the funny parts of the movie. Literally.

    Nipples are great.

  • 13 09 2005
  • 19.  SpankMonkey (09:38:34) :

    #17 – The point is that photographers are taking risque pics and then the magazine reverse-fakes them. They make the clothes opaque, add panties, whatever.
    Since the fake is actually the one on the magazine cover it makes it near impossible to determine if a pic is a fake or if the magazine is faked. Add to that the problem that magazines are faking by removing clothes, photoshopping poses and clothing styles, etc, and we end up completely fucked for being able to determine “fakeness”.
    The pic in question does make her appear to have some meet-in-the-middle boobie flaps as well as giant nipples. That doesn’t necessarily make it fake though. Fake Detective didn’t have anything on this one as far as I could tell.

  • 13 09 2005
  • 20.  angel (10:51:38) :

    Why would the photographer submit a different photograph to his agency than the one that is given to GQ publishers? Because of that I am assuming JLH on GQ is doctored.

Leave a comment

You can use these tags : <a href=""> <b> <blockquote> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>